Reversible and symmetric rings

By G. Marks. 2002

107 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Algebra and Number Theory, Geometry and Topology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9427e50544d4fa9ab6907da81de117c7e2ff8a07

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Algebra and Number Theory

1. Pace P. Nielsen
2. V. Camillo
3. G. Marks

In Geometry and Topology

1. Pace P. Nielsen
2. V. Camillo
3. G. Marks

Citations in the corpus

• A UNIFIED APPROACH TO VARIOUS GENERALIZATIONS OF ARMENDARIZ RINGS (2010, unknown): “Then R [[ S , ω ]] is the group algebra RS , which by [27, Example 7] is reversible but not reduced.”
• A taxonomy of 2-primal rings (2003, background): “Rings of Types V and VI were constructed in [45] in order to rectify the occasi assertion in the literature that there do not exist rings that are reversible but not sym We will content ourselves with a brief sketch of two counterexamples to this asse details can be found in [45].”
• McCoy rings and zero-divisors (2008, background): “The following zero-divisor conditions are all standard, and we direct the reader to the excellent papers [1], [10], and [11] for a nice introduction to these topics.”