Identifying Rivals and Rivalries in World Politics
By W. Thompson. 2001
436 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Development, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/94216cb19fe2d45b3b7f909d15ec16e7e4683587
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Development
- Benjamin O. Fordham
- Dorothée Rouzet
- Philippe Aghion
- M. Fuhrmann
- Thomas C. Walker
- Torsten Persson
- David Yanagizawa-Drott
In Political Science and International Relations
- Benjamin O. Fordham
- Dorothée Rouzet
- Philippe Aghion
- M. Fuhrmann
- Thomas C. Walker
- Torsten Persson
- Jakob B. Madsen
- Ludger Woessmann
In Sociology and Political Science
- Benjamin O. Fordham
- Dorothée Rouzet
- Philippe Aghion
- M. Fuhrmann
- Thomas C. Walker
- Torsten Persson
- Timothy J. Besley
- Andreas Bergh
Citations in the corpus
- Trade does promote peace: New simultaneous estimates of the reciprocal effects of trade and conflict (2010, neutral): “We thank Sandeep Baliga, Karl DeRouen, Walter Enders, James Fearon, Douglas Gibler, Valentin Krustev, David Lucca, Lanny Martin, T Clifton Morgan, Michael New, William Nordhaus, Rosa Sandoval, Kenneth Schultz, Christopher Sims, Richard Stoll, Robert Driskill and Michael Tomz for helpful advice.”
- Kantian Liberalism, Regime Type, and Military Resource Allocation: Do Democracies Spend Less? (2005, background): “In order to represent the threat posed by other states, we will consider the military power of the ‘‘strategic rivals’’ that William Thompson (2001) has identified for each state.”
- Taking a Walk on the Supply Side (2009, methodology): “27 I substituted variables measuring whether the states in the dyad were involved in a militarized interstate dispute that resulted in a least one fatality or were involved in a rivalry using definitions offered by Thompson (2001) and Klein, Goertz, and Diehl (2006).”
- Education and Military Rivalry (2018, positive): “Thompson (2001) lists the following qualitative coding rules to define strategic rivalries and their duration for the period 1816-1999: 1.”
- Rival conceptions of rivalry: why some competitions mean more than others (2015, neutral): “more complex than dispute-density (Thompson, 2001).”