Endless Forms: The Evolution of Gene Regulation and Morphological Diversity
By Sean B. Carroll. 2000
495 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93c4ae95fd072e2645eeda23bb2285af671554d3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences (2014, background): “It is still lively debated whether changes in coding- or non-coding sequences are more relevant to the evolution of genes and new traits (Carroll 2000; Hoekstra and Coyne 2007; Wray 2007; Lynch and Wagner 2008; Wittkopp and Kalay 2012).”
- THE LOCUS OF EVOLUTION: EVO DEVO AND THE GENETICS OF ADAPTATION (2007, background): “But the most vigorous advocate of this view has been Carroll, who, in a series of papers, scholarly books, and popular books (Carroll 2000; 2005a,b; Carroll et al. 2001, 2006), has repeatedly emphasized that the evolution of animal form and other macroevolutionary features resulted largely from…”
- The Ancestral Developmental Tool Kit of Land Plants (2007, background): “Three primary genetic mechanisms have been proposed for the evolution of morphological novelty (Doebley and Lukens 1998; Patthy 1999; Carroll 2000).”
- Similarities and Differences in Genome-Wide Expression Data of Six Organisms (2003, background): “However, expression profiles that include only a very small fraction of the genes, as well as genes whose expression was recorded only under few experimental conditions cannot be associated reliably to transcription modules and should therefore be excluded from the analysis.”
- The importance of phenotypic plasticity and local adaptation in driving intraspecific variability in thermal niches of marine macrophytes (2018, background): “This can result in certain genes being ‘switched’ on or off as well as altering the magnitude of expression, both of which can alter phenotype (McDonald et al., 1977; Carroll, 2000).”