Understanding gambling related harm: a proposed definition, conceptual framework, and taxonomy of harms

By E. Langham, H. Thorne, Matthew Browne, Phillip Donaldson, Judy Rose, M. Rockloff. BMC Public Health, 2015

628 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundHarm from gambling is known to impact individuals, families, and communities; and these harms are not restricted to people with a gambling disorder. Currently, there is no robust and inclusive internationally agreed upon definition of gambling harm. In addition, the current landscape of gambling policy and research uses inadequate proxy measures of harm, such as problem gambling symptomology, that contribute to a limited understanding of gambling harms. These issues impede efforts to address gambling from a public health perspective.MethodsData regarding harms from gambling was gathered using four separate methodologies, a literature review, focus groups and interviews with professionals involved in the support and treatment of gambling problems, interviews with people who gamble and their affected others, and an analysis of public forum posts for people experiencing problems with gambling and their affected others. The experience of harm related to gambling was examined to generate a conceptual framework. The catalogue of harms experienced were organised as a taxonomy.ResultsThe current paper proposes a definition and conceptual framework of gambling related harm that captures the full breadth of harms that gambling can contribute to; as well as a taxonomy of harms to facilitate the development of more appropriate measures of harm.ConclusionsOur aim is to create a dialogue that will lead to a more coherent interpretation of gambling harm across treatment providers, policy makers and researchers.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93b5c3c6c86c7e54b09096d260196842d094cddf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. N. Greer
  2. Matthew Browne
  3. V. Rawat
  4. M. Rockloff

Citations in the corpus