A strong loophole-free test of local realism

By L. Shalm, E. Meyer-Scott, B. Christensen, P. Bierhorst, M. A. Wayne, M. Stevens, T. Gerrits, S. Glancy, Deny Hamel, M. Allman and 24 more. Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics, 2015

1,250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We performed an loophole-free test of Bells inequalities. The probability that local realism is compatible with our results is less than 5.9×10<sup>-9</sup>.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93afab7ccf6045c217aef21c8588f8a6e23e39e7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Mehul Malik
  2. Lixing You
  3. Miles J. Padgett
  4. P. Moreau
  5. T. Gregory
  6. E. Toninelli
  7. Marcus Huber
  8. Mario Krenn

In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

  1. Mehul Malik
  2. Mario Krenn
  3. Miles J. Padgett
  4. Fabio Sciarrino
  5. Manuel Erhard
  6. Anton Zeilinger
  7. Robert Fickler
  8. Lixing You

In Statistical and Nonlinear Physics

  1. Juan Carlos García-Escartín
  2. Mehul Malik
  3. Miles J. Padgett
  4. Miguel Herrero-Collantes
  5. Giuseppe Vitagliano
  6. Marcus Huber
  7. Nicolai Friis
  8. Anton Zeilinger

Citations in the corpus