Parasitoid Drift After Biological Control Introductions: Re-examining Pandora's Box

By P. Follett, J. Duan, R. Messing, Vincent Jones. 2000

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Insect Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93a8fb902904c0ef6efb91b38624657864a7c262

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

1. P. Rijn
2. A. Hajek
3. S. Louda
4. R. Messing
5. M. Thomas
6. A. Loomans
7. J. C. Lenteren
8. Urs Schaffner

In Insect Science

1. J. C. Lenteren
2. S. Louda
3. A. Hajek
4. D. Babendreier
5. R. Messing
6. Franz Bigler
7. P. Mason
8. M. Wright

Citations in the corpus

• A review of introductions of pathogens and nematodes for classical biological control of insects and mites (2007, background): “However, this decrease could also have similar roots as the decline in classical biological programs introducing parasitoids and predators (e.g., Follett et al., 2000), that appear to be associated with increased regulatory restrictions to ensure environmental safety of releases.”
• Selection of non-target species for host specificity testing of entomophagous biological control agents. (2005, background): “Second International Symposium on Biological Control of Arthropods 566”
• Nontarget effects--the Achilles' heel of biological control? Retrospective analyses to reduce risk associated with biocontrol introductions. (2003, background): “Adverse effects on native species, representing a continuum from small effects to extinctions (31, 37), must be quantified to be evaluated.”
• Environmental risk assessment of exotic natural enemies used in inundative biological control (2003, background): “During testing, the target and non-target hosts should be offered in a natural host distribution pattern, on the natural host plant or part of that or on an alternative host plant, which is not repellent for natural enemy (van Dijken et al., 1986; Follett et al., 2000; Sands, 1988).”
• Does fundamental host range match ecological host range? A retrospective case study of a Lygus plant bug parasitoid (2005, background): “The main areas of concern include the irreversibility of exotic introductions, the dispersal of non-indigenous natural enemies to new habitats, and the potential host range expansion of the agent to include native or beneWcial insects, thereby causing harm to such non-target hosts (non-target eVects”
• Biological control of invasive species: solution or pollution? (2006, background): “Retrospective analyses of these and other case histories (Follett et al. 2000; Louda et al. 2003) provide the first real data to begin formulating biocontrol protocols in order to minimize risk.”
• Intraguild responses of aphid predators on apple to the invasion of an exotic species, Harmonia axyridis (2003, unknown): “Follett et al. (2000) concluded their analysis of the risks of biological control introductions by calling for more case histories on the impacts of past introductions.”