The Cathedral and the Bazaar
By P. Salus. 2000
1,413 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Archeology, History, Software Engineering
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Archeology
- Christian Bird
- Robert E Kopp
- John W. Holt
- Peter C. Rigby
- Timothy D. Raub
- Christopher T. Baumgartner
- J. Kirschvink
In History
- Christian Bird
- Robert E Kopp
- John W. Holt
- Peter C. Rigby
- Timothy D. Raub
- Christopher T. Baumgartner
- J. Kirschvink
In Software Engineering
- Christian Bird
- Robert E Kopp
- John W. Holt
- Peter C. Rigby
- Timothy D. Raub
- Christopher T. Baumgartner
- J. Kirschvink
Citations in the corpus
- An empirical study of open-source and closed-source software products (2004, background): “Raymond [12] notes that open-source systems often succeed because of their simplicity.”
- Boa: A language and infrastructure for analyzing ultra-large-scale software repositories (2013, background): “[4]”; “how many projects on an average start with an existing code base from another project instead of scratch?”
- Information systems success in free and open source software development: theory and measures (2006, background): “However, for FLOSS projects (and indeed many other types of projects) development is instead an ongoing activity, as the project continues to release “often and early” (Raymond, 1998).”
- The case for open computer programs (2012, background): “, but our contention is more practical: that the cause of reproducibility is best furthered by focusing on the dissection and understanding of code, a sentiment already appreciated by the growing open-source movemen”
- Rapid, precise, and high‐sensitivity acquisition of paleomagnetic and rock‐magnetic data: Development of a low‐noise automatic sample changing system for superconducting rock magnetometers (2008, methodology): “Open source collaboration, driven by the desire to ‘‘scratch a developer’s personal itch’’ [Raymond, 2001], is ideal for such a situation.”
- Convergent contemporary software peer review practices (2013, methodology): “The self-selection used in review tools is accomplished by adding a group (e.g., a mailing list) to the reviewer list, then individuals from this group can find the review [20, 2].”