Little hierarchy, little higgses, and a little symmetry
By Hsin-Chia Cheng, I. Low. 2004
388 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Little Higgs theories are an attempt to address the ``little hierarchy problem,'' i.e., the tension between the naturalness of the electroweak scale and the precision electroweak measurements showing no evidence for new physics up to 5 – 10 TeV. In little Higgs theories, the Higgs mass-squareds are protected at one-loop order from the quadratic divergences. This allows the cutoff of the theory to be raised up to ~ 10 TeV, beyond the scales probed by the current precision data. However, strong constraints can still arise from the contributions of the new TeV scale particles which cancel the one-loop quadratic divergences from the standard model fields, and hence re-introduces the fine-tuning problem. In this paper we show that a new symmetry, denoted as T-parity, under which all heavy gauge bosons and scalar triplets are odd, can remove all the tree-level contributions to the electroweak observables and therefore makes the little Higgs theories completely natural. The T-parity can be manifestly implemented in a majority of little Higgs models by following the most general construction of the low energy effective theory a la Callan, Coleman, Wess and Zumino. In particular, we discuss in detail how to implement the T-parity in the littlest Higgs model based on SU(5)/SO(5). The symmetry breaking scale f can be even lower than 500 GeV if the contributions from the higher dimensional operators due to the unknown UV physics at the cutoff are somewhat small. The existence of T-parity has drastic impacts on the phenomenology of the little Higgs theories. The T-odd particles need to be pair-produced and will cascade down to the lightest T-odd particle (LTP) which is stable. A neutral LTP gives rise to missing energy signals at the colliders which can mimic supersymmetry. It can also serve as a good dark matter candidate.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Political Science and International Relations
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/939a6480e0a077a693e6e2031774497e613c40da
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- David Tucker-Smith
- M. Schmaltz
- N. Arkani-Hamed
- Konstantin T. Matchev
- S. Dimopoulos
- Kyoungchul Kong
- S. Kachru
- I. Low
In Nuclear and High Energy Physics
- David Tucker-Smith
- S. Kachru
- S. Dimopoulos
- N. Arkani-Hamed
- Kyoungchul Kong
- M. Schmaltz
- AseshKrishna Datta
- Konstantin T. Matchev
In Political Science and International Relations
- S. Kachru
- S. Dimopoulos
- N. Arkani-Hamed
- David Tucker-Smith
- M. Schmaltz
- Cms Collaboration
- G. Villadoro
- G. Giudice
Citations in the corpus
- LITTLE HIGGS THEORIES (2005, methodology): “This idea was first suggested in [11, 12], and was recently revived by Arkani-Hamed, Cohen and Georgi when they constructed the first successful “little Higgs” model [13], and thereby started an industry of “little model building” [14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, ”