What Can We Learn with Statistical Truth Serum?Design and Analysis of the List Experiment
By Adam Glynn. 2013
386 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Sociology and Political Science, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/939378441696d03655405d95b9d7dac2ba69eaeb
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Sociology and Political Science
- Margaret Moor
- Kenneth F. Greene
- O. J. Reuter
- Scott Gehlbach
- Joseph P. Robinson-Cimpian
- R. Michael Alvarez
- Bethany Park
- A. Coppock
In Statistics and Probability
- Kenneth F. Greene
- Bethany Park
- A. Coppock
- Margaret Moor
- Graeme Blair
- Kosuke Imai
- O. J. Reuter
- Scott Gehlbach
Citations in the corpus
- Using the Predicted Responses from List Experiments as Explanatory Variables in Regression Models (2015, methodology): “We measure vote-selling and turnout using a list experiment embedded in the Mexico 2012 Panel Study, designed and fielded by Greene et al. (2012). Allegations of vote-buying featured prominently in the presidential election of that year.”
- When to Worry about Sensitivity Bias: A Social Reference Theory and Evidence from 30 Years of List Experiments (2020, methodology): “10 Just after introducing the standard design, Miller (1984) proposed the double list experiment design, in which all subjects participate in two list experiments with different control items but the same sensitive item (see also Droitcour et al. 1991; Glynn 2013).”
- Multivariate Regression Analysis for the Item Count Technique (2011, methodology): “Glynn (2010) suggests an adjustment to the difference-inmeans estimator, which yields greater efficiency at the cost of bias.”
- Paying Attention to Inattentive Survey Respondents (2019, background): “…political attitudes and behavior, including a double-list experiment—an indirect questioning technique introduced in Droitcour et al. (1991), which combines two standard list experiments on the same sensitive issue to improve efficiency and gain additional diagnostic opportunities (Glynn 2013).”
- Statistical Analysis of List Experiments (2012, methodology): “…some have begun to apply multivariate regression techniques such as linear regression with interaction terms (e.g.,Holbrook and Krosnick 2010; Glynn 2010; Coutts and Jann 2011) and an 1A variant of this technique was originally proposed byRaghavarao and Federer(1979), who called it theblock…”
- Inaccurate Estimation of Disparities Due to Mischievous Responders (2014, background): “For further reading, see Glynn (2013), Kreuter, Presser, and Tourangeau (2008), Tourangeau and Yan (2007), and Wolter and Preisendörfer (2013).”
- Is Putin’s popularity real? (2015, methodology): “We follow Glynn (2013) in randomly assigning every respondent to the treatment group for one list experiment and the control group for the other.”
- Controlling social desirability bias (2018, background): “Each subject states how many items in their list are true (i.e., “item count”; Glynn, 2013; Lippitt, Masterson, Sierra, Davis, & White, 2014).”