Horizontal velocity structure functions in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere 1

By John Y. N. Cho, E. Lindborg. 2001

195 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The energy cascade in a strongly stratified fluid (2006, methodology): “As for the value of , Cho & Lindborg (2001) and Lindborg & Cho (2001b) made the estimates K = 6.0 × 10−5 m2 s−3 and P = 2.0 × 10−5 m2 s−3, based on third-order structure-function calculations using airplane data from the lower stratosphere.”
Wave Modeling—Missing the Peaks (2009, background): “A typical atmospheric spectrum (see Nastrom and Gage 1985; also section 2 in W) implies a k23 cascade in the lower-frequency range (k is the wavenumber), followed by a k25/3 decay in the higher range (Cho and Lindborg 2001).”
Scaling analysis and simulation of strongly stratified turbulent flows (2007, background): “Moreover, examinations of atmospheric data support the forward energy cascade hypothesis (Cho & Lindborg 2001; Lindborg & Cho 2001).”
The k−3 and k−5/3 Energy Spectrum of Atmospheric Turbulence: Quasigeostrophic Two-Level Model Simulation (2001, methodology): “Cho and Lindborg (2001) calculated a value of 2 3 10215 s23 for relative enstrophy flux in the observed polar stratosphere while we obtain the same value for potential enstrophy flux in our simulation. g. Observed diagnostics For comparison, we present in Fig.”