Sub-surface convection zones in hot massive stars and their observable consequences

By Matteo Cantiello, N. Langer, I. Brott, A. D. Koter, S. Shore, J. Vink, A. Voegler, D. Lennon, S.-C. Yoon. 2009

258 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Context. We study the convection zones in the outer envelope of hot massive stars which are caused by opacity peaks associated with iron and helium ionization. Aims. We determine the occurrence and properties of these convection zones as function of the stellar parameters. We then confront our results with observations of OB stars. Methods. A stellar evolution code is used to compute a grid of massive star models at different metallicities. In these models, the mixing length theory is used to characterize the envelope convection zones. Results. We find the iron convection zone (FeCZ) to be more prominent fo r lower surface gravity, higher luminosity and higher initi al metallicity. It is absent for luminosities below about 10 3.2 L⊙, 10 3.9 L⊙, and 10 4.2 L⊙ for the Galaxy, LMC and SMC, respectively. We map the strength of the FeCZ on the Hertzsprung-Russell diagram for three metallicities, and compare this with the occurrence of observational phenomena in O stars: microturbulence, non-radial pulsations, wind clumping, and line profile variabil ity. Conclusions. The confirmation of all three trends for the FeCZ as function o f stellar parameters by empirical microturbulent velociti es argues for a physical connection between sub-photospheric convective motions and small scale stochastic velocities i n the photosphere of O- and B-type stars. We further suggest that clumping in the inner parts of the winds of OB stars could be caused by the same mechanism, and that magnetic fields produced in the FeCZ coul d appear at the surface of OB stars as diagnosed by discrete absorption components in ultraviolet absorption lines.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9388030736e9ba98e88cd06942b0e9bba93b25ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Selma de Mink
  2. N. Langer
  3. N. Smith
  4. Ilya Mandel
  5. Matteo Cantiello
  6. Aaron Dotter
  7. Stan Woosley
  8. Michela Mapelli

In Instrumentation

  1. Selma de Mink
  2. N. Langer
  3. N. Smith
  4. Aaron Dotter
  5. B. Paxton
  6. Ilya Mandel
  7. J. Vink
  8. A. D. Koter

Citations in the corpus