Preference Utilisation and Tariff Reduction in EU Imports from ACP Countries

By M. Manchin. 2006

122 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/937f9375917a4afad63cd1fb34ed6cc2348e73d6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Olivier Cadot
2. Céline Carrère
3. Joseph Francois
4. H. Meijl
5. F. V. Tongeren
6. G. Wignaraja
7. B. Tumurchudur
8. Jaime de Melo

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Joseph Francois
2. G. Wignaraja
3. B. Tumurchudur
4. Céline Carrère
5. Jaime de Melo
6. Olivier Cadot

In Strategy and Management

1. Olivier Cadot
2. Joseph Francois
3. Céline Carrère
4. G. Wignaraja
5. B. Tumurchudur
6. Jaime de Melo
7. H. Meijl
8. Ben Shepherd

Citations in the corpus

• Trade Liberalization in the Doha Development Round (2005, background): “For example, Manchin (2004) and World Bank (2005) find that many developing nations do not use their preferences.”
• Economic Implications of Asian Integration (2008, background): “Recent estimates place these costs at anywhere from 6 percent to 30 percent of the costs of goods traded (Francois, Hoekman and Manchin 2006; Manchin and Pelkmans 2007: Manchin 2006).”
• Product-specific rules of origin in EU and US preferential trading arrangements: an assessment (2006, methodology): “16 Using threshold estimation techniques, Manchin (2004) estimates for the same data that preferential status is not asked when 3 4% i τ − <”