The (bio)diversity of science reflects the interests of society
By John R. U. Wilson, Ş. Procheş, Brigitte Braschler, Edd S. Dixon, D. Richardson. 2007
107 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93443686f16a733b62fef4c9e275bbbc0b1fae37
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecological Modeling
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Petr Pyšek
- D. Richardson
- Jan Pergl
- V. Jarošı́k
- F. Essl
- Jonathan M. Jeschke
- Lise Comte
- G. Grenouillet
Citations in the corpus
- Elton, C.S. 1958: The ecology of invasions by animals and plants. London: Methuen (2007, background): “…featured in the book’s title, are given scant coverage (only 18 species of vascular plants in the index), while other groups, in keeping even with current research in invasion ecology (Wilson et al., 2007a), get much less coverage: fungi (5 spp.), protists (2 spp.) and red alga (1 species).”
- The role of species charisma in biological invasions (2020, background): “2008), there is, overall, a greater focus on invasive vertebrates than invertebrates, and on large and charismatic species (Wilson et al. 2007).”
- Climate‐induced changes in the distribution of freshwater fish: observed and predicted trends (2013, background): “However, most previous reviews could be biased towards restricted geographic locations or ‘iconic’ species of interest, thus limiting robust generalisations (Wilson et al., 2007).”
- Geographical and taxonomic biases in invasion ecology. (2008, background): “Because there are still large taxonomic and geographical gaps in ecological research in general [ 8 ], one might ask whether current knowledge in invasion ecology is taxonomically and/or geographically biased.”