Limits to feature size and resolution in ink jet printing

By Jonathan Stringer, B. Derby. 2009

184 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9335ed9851018d50aefab630804424eca4e8136d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Mechanics

1. Marc P. Y. Desmulliez
2. Gerard Cummins
3. Madhuri Dey
4. Ibrahim T. Ozbolat
5. B. Derby
6. Hemanth Gudapati

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

1. Marc P. Y. Desmulliez
2. Gerard Cummins
3. Ibrahim T. Ozbolat
4. Hemanth Gudapati
5. Madhuri Dey
6. B. Derby

In Materials Chemistry

1. Marc P. Y. Desmulliez
2. Gerard Cummins
3. B. Derby

Citations in the corpus

• Inkjet printing of conductive materials: a review (2012, background): “The rest of this energy is converted into surface energy, which spreads the droplet to a diameter determined by the relative surface energy between the ink and the substrate in the second stage of the deposition process (Stringer and Derby, 2009; Yarin, 2006).”
• Additive Manufacture of Ceramics Components by Inkjet Printing (2015, methodology): “[42] and modelled in more detail by Stringer and Derby [43, 44].”
• A comprehensive review on droplet-based bioprinting: Past, present and future. (2016, background): “In addition, how droplets interact with the substrate affects the spreading behavior of the droplet, which consequently affects the bioprinting resolution [76,77,81,85].”