Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questions

By Johannes Welbl, Nelson F. Liu, Matt Gardner. 2017

891 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a novel method for obtaining high-quality, domain-targeted multiple choice questions from crowd workers. Generating these questions can be difficult without trading away originality, relevance or diversity in the answer options. Our method addresses these problems by leveraging a large corpus of domain-specific text and a small set of existing questions. It produces model suggestions for document selection and answer distractor choice which aid the human question generation process. With this method we have assembled SciQ, a dataset of 13.7K multiple choice science exam questions. We demonstrate that the method produces in-domain questions by providing an analysis of this new dataset and by showing that humans cannot distinguish the crowdsourced questions from original questions. When using SciQ as additional training data to existing questions, we observe accuracy improvements on real science exams.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Information Systems, Natural Language Processing, Evaluation & Benchmarks

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  3. Yejin Choi
  4. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  5. Percy Liang
  6. Graham Neubig
  7. Noah A. Smith
  8. Jianfeng Gao

In Computer Science Applications

  1. Ashish Sabharwal
  2. Walter Daelemans
  3. Simon Suster
  4. Tushar Khot
  5. Peter Clark
  6. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  7. Rui Xia
  8. Pengfei Liu

In Information Systems

  1. Tushar Khot
  2. Ashish Sabharwal
  3. Maosong Sun
  4. Peter Clark
  5. Christopher D. Manning
  6. Zhiyuan Liu
  7. Xu Han
  8. Andrew McCallum

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Mohit Bansal
  2. Yejin Choi
  3. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  4. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  5. Samuel R. Bowman
  6. Ashish Sabharwal
  7. Percy Liang
  8. Jonathan Berant

In Evaluation & Benchmarks

  1. Ashish Sabharwal
  2. Peter Clark
  3. Luke S. Zettlemoyer
  4. Mohit Bansal
  5. Tushar Khot
  6. Samuel R. Bowman
  7. Hannaneh Hajishirzi
  8. Kyle Richardson

Citations in the corpus