Public understanding of solar radiation management
By A. Mercer, David William Keith, Jacqueline Sharp. Environmental Research Letters, 2011
168 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We report the results of the first large-scale international survey of public perception of geoengineering and solar radiation management (SRM). Our sample of 3105 individuals in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom was recruited by survey firms that administer internet surveys to nationally representative population samples. Measured familiarity was higher than expected, with 8% and 45% of the population correctly defining the terms geoengineering and climate engineering respectively. There was strong support for allowing the study of SRM. Support decreased and uncertainty rose as subjects were asked about their support for using SRM immediately, or to stop a climate emergency. Support for SRM is associated with optimism about scientific research, a valuing of SRM’s benefits and a stronger belief that SRM is natural, while opposition is associated with an attitude that nature should not be manipulated in this way. The potential risks of SRM are important drivers of public perception with the most salient being damage to the ozone layer and unknown risks. SRM is a new technology and public opinions are just forming; thus all reported results are sensitive to changes in framing, future information on risks and benefits, and changes to context.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9322a554e79ee95b337528494a75bf292cf346ab
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Public understanding of, and attitudes to, climate change: UK and international perspectives and policy (2012, background): “…similar fashion, it can only be speculated at this stage how some of the more radical technological proposals for addressing climate change, such as climate geoengineering, will interact with public views if they are ultimately developed and deployed (see Mercer et al., 2011; Pidgeon et al., 2012).”