A damage model for the simulation of delamination in advanced composites under variable-mode loading

By A. Turón, Pedro P. Camanho, Josep Costa, C. Dávila. 2006

1,032 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/931103a1acdfd3dfe3153f37745e444229a1850f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanics of Materials

Citations in the corpus

Predicting low velocity impact damage and Compression-After-Impact (CAI) behaviour of composite laminates (2015, neutral): “(11) in [23]).”
A procedure for superposing linear cohesive laws to represent multiple damage mechanisms in the fracture of composites (2009, background): “A row of four-node cohesive elements ( Turon et al. 2006 ) is used to model softening and crack propagation.”
Computational micromechanics of the transverse and shear behavior of unidirectional fiber reinforced polymers including environmental effects (2017, background): “The cohesive constitutive equation relates the displacement jump across the interface to the 128 traction vector acting on it for cracking under the full range of mode-mixities as in [30].”
Accurate simulation of delamination growth under mixed-mode loading using cohesive elements: Definition of interlaminar strengths and elastic stiffness (2010, methodology): “The Benzeggagh and Kenane criterion [25] is used to define these parameters, yielding [10]:”
On cohesive element parameters and delamination modelling (2019, background): “(2), the normal and shear interfacial strengths directly govern failure initiation at the material interface [45].”
A phantom node formulation with mixed mode cohesive law for splitting in laminates (2009, methodology): “We assume that the fracture energy of the material can be described properly with the phenomenological relation proposed for delamination by Benzeggagh and Kenane (1996), which has been applied in interface elements by Camanho et al. (2003) and Turon et al. (2006) :”
Continuum Models for the Analysis of Progressive Failure in Composite Laminates (2009, background): “[34], containing five material parameters: normal strength tn, shear strength ts, mode I fracture energy GI, mode II fracture energy GII and mode interaction parameter Z (see also ref.”
Mesh‐independent matrix cracking and delamination modeling in laminated composites (2011, methodology): “For the bilinear constitutive model [5] used in the present paper, this relationship is nonlinear and a displacement jump of approximately 0.”
Progressive Failure Analysis of Composites (2008, methodology): “For delamination propagation, the Benzeggagh–Kenane [104] criterion is used [42]:”
Hybrid titanium–CFRP laminates for high-performance bolted joints (2009, methodology): “To mitigate these difficulties and to simulate the possible 262 delamination growth from the singular points, cohesive finite elements previously developed 263 and implemented as Abaqus user-defined elements [27] are used along the Titanium-CFRP and 264 CFRP-CFRP interfaces.”
Drilling in carbon/epoxy composites: Experimental investigations and finite element implementation (2013, neutral): “[33-34]:”
Computational modeling of complex failure mechanisms in laminates (2012, methodology): “In an earlier study, we have proposed to solve this by coupling the traction to the stress in the surrounding bulk material,43 based on work by Moonen et al.61 Another strategy to get rid of the singularity is to start from a non-rigid cohesive law and then shift the origin such that the traction fo”
Measurement of resistance curves in the longitudinal failure of composites using digital image correlation (2010, neutral): “Despite the significant advances in the analysis models for the prediction of fracture in composite materials such as advanced failure criteria and associated damage models [1–7], sophisticated kinematic representations of failure mechanisms [8,9], and cohesive elements to deal with delamination [10”