Winners and Losers: Impact of the Doha Round on Developing Countries
By S. Polaski. 2006
131 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/93071a33dcc7835163ea2faa8d48e92723e6edee
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Adeolu O. Adewuyi
- Oyejide Titiloye Ademola
- A. Bankole
- Kristen Hopewell
Citations in the corpus
- China–Africa Trade Relations: Insights from AERC Scoping Studies (2009, background): “There is a caveat; though the relative importance of the industrial sector declines as resources move to agricultural sector, Polaski (2006) has showed that SSA would lose from global liberalisation of agriculture and derive little gain from liberalisation of manufactures, while SSA requires special”
- The 2008 Food Price Crisis: Rethinking Food Security Policies (2009, unknown): “The losers include many of the world’s LDCs, including Bangladesh and the countries of East Africa as well as the rest of sub-Saharan Africa” (Polaski, 2006).”
- Different paths to power: The rise of Brazil, India and China at the World Trade Organization (2014, background): “…of the world’s leading agricultural exporters has defined its primary interest in the Doha Round as seeking to expand markets for its agricultural exports.12 It is widely viewed as being among the biggest potential winners from the round and has been one of its strongest supporters (Polaski, 2006).”