Is Trust a Realistic Goal of Environmental Risk Communication?

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Perception and Communication of Flood Risks: A Systematic Review of Empirical Research (2013, unknown): “Trettin and Musham((19)) clarify these parties as”
Citizen Satisfaction with Public Meetings Used for Risk Communication (2003, result): “While overcoming perceptions of untrustworthiness may be difficult (and some argue even unrealistic, e.g., Trettin & Musham, 2000), the results suggest that efforts taken to increase credibility may also increase satisfaction.”
Exploring the Dimensionality of Trust in Risk Regulation (2003, background): “…indeed a (empirical and psychological) discernable aspect of trust and how this interacts with other evaluations of (risk regulatory) institutions.2 Reflecting upon the overall pattern of results, Trettin and Musham (2000) have recently questioned the importance of enhancing trust in institutions.”