Determination of the last stable orbit for circular general relativistic binaries at the third post-Newtonian approximation
By T. Damour, P. Jaranowski, G. Schaefer. 2000
300 citations recorded by the source corpus.
We discuss the analytical determination of the location of the last stable orbit (LSO) in circular general relativistic orbits of two point masses. We deal with the problem of the slow convergence of post-Newtonian expansions by ``resumming'' them in various ways. We use several different resummation methods (including new ones) based on the consideration of gauge-invariant functions, and compare the results they give at the third post-Newtonian (3PN) approximation of general relativity. Our treatment is based on the 3PN Hamiltonian of Jaranowski and Sch\"afer. One of the new methods we introduce is based on the consideration of the (invariant) function linking the angular momentum and the angular frequency. We also generalize the ``effective one-body'' approach of Buonanno and Damour by introducing a non-minimal (i.e. ``non-geodesic'') effective dynamics at the 3PN level. We find that the location of the LSO sensitively depends on the (currently unknown) value of the dimensionless quantity ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{\mathrm{static}}$ which parametrizes a certain regularization ambiguity of the 3PN dynamics. We find, however, that all the analytical methods we use numerically agree among themselves if the value of this parameter is ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{\mathrm{static}}\ensuremath{\simeq}\ensuremath{-}9.$ This suggests that the correct value of ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{\mathrm{static}}$ is near $\ensuremath{-}9$ [the precise value ${\ensuremath{\omega}}_{\mathrm{static}}^{*}\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{-}47/3+(41/64){\ensuremath{\pi}}^{2}=\ensuremath{-}9.3439\dots{}$ seems to play a special role]. If this is the case, we then show how to further improve the analytical determination of various LSO quantities by using a ``Shanks'' transformation to accelerate the convergence of the successive (already resummed) PN estimates.
Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92e6dd1e2e0095e721d850e3ad2a167bb314fa74
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Astronomy and Astrophysics
Citations in the corpus
- Black-hole binaries, gravitational waves, and numerical relativity (2010, background): “(39) The expressions for A(r), D(r) and Q(r) are chosen so that the PN-expansion of the Hamiltonian is consistent with the results from PN theory to known order (3 PN for nonspinning black holes) (Buonanno and Damour, 1999, 2000; Damour et al., 2000).”
- Nonlocal-in-time action for the fourth post-Newtonian conservative dynamics of two-body systems (2014, result): “[49] T.”
- Gravitational scattering, post-Minkowskian approximation, and effective-one-body theory (2016, background): “[3] finally kept this assumption on b1.”
- Classical and quantum scattering in post-Minkowskian gravity (2019, background): “The basic feature of the EOB formalism [43–45] is to describe the two-body dynamics in terms of a one-body Hamiltonian, which describes the dynamics of the relative two-body motion within the c.”
- Massive Black Hole Binary Evolution (2004, background): “Adopting various approximations for the radius of the innermost stable circular orbit (ISCO) for comparably massive binaries [28, 17, 81, 31], and assuming that mass and”