Ten Years After the Financial Crisis: What Have We Learned from the Renaissance in Fiscal Research?

By V. Ramey. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2019

399 citations recorded by the source corpus.

This paper takes stock of what we have learned from the “Renaissance” in fiscal research in the ten years since the financial crisis. I first discuss the new innovations in methodology and various strengths and weaknesses of the main approaches to estimating fiscal multipliers. Reviewing the estimates, I come to the surprising conclusion that the bulk of the estimates for average spending and tax change multipliers lie in a fairly narrow range, 0.6 to 1 for spending multipliers and -2 to -3 for tax change multipliers. However, I identify economic circumstances in which multipliers lie outside those ranges. Finally, I review the debate on whether multipliers were higher for the 2009 Obama stimulus spending in the United States or for fiscal consolidations in Europe.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92e385fda2e9a0bc814e3fef75531b567d4998aa

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

  1. Mark W. Watson
  2. James H. Stock
  3. Serena Ng
  4. Jushan Bai
  5. J. M. Olea
  6. Cameron Hepburn
  7. Domenico Giannone
  8. Massimiliano Marcellino

Citations in the corpus