Procedural Justice, Police Legitimacy, and Helping the Police Fight Crime
By Michael D. Reisig, C. Lloyd. 2009
303 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92d597823d7f31c53feb80de48ff92ec383386aa
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Sociology and Political Science
- Jacinta M. Gau
- Kristina Murphy
- Scott E. Wolfe
- J. Jackson
- B. Bradford
- Tom Tyler
- Michael D. Reisig
- Ivan Sun
Citations in the corpus
- Procedural justice versus risk factors for offending: predicting recidivism in youth. (2014, background): “…and between legitimacy beliefs and offending or self-reported legal compliance (Fagan & Piquero, 2007; Fagan & Tyler, 2005; Hinds, 2009; but see also Reisig & Lloyd, 2009), only one study directly examined whether legitimacy beliefs mediate the relationship between procedural justice and behavior.”
- Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Public Cooperation with Police (2017, background): “In Jamaica, adolescents who evaluated the police more favorably in terms of procedural justice were more inclined to view the police as legitimate and to cooperate with the police, although legitimacy itself was not linked to cooperation (Reisig and Lloyd 2009).”
- Legal Cynicism, Legitimacy, and Criminal Offending (2011, background): “…law affect a number of outcomes, including helping the police fight crime (Murphy & Fleming, 2008; Reisig, Bratton, & Gertz, 2007; Tyler & Fagan, 2008; cf. Reisig & Lloyd, 2009) and willingness to serve as a juror or appear as a witness in a criminal court trial (Robinson, Goodwin, & Reisig, 2010).”
- Shaping Citizen Perceptions of Police Legitimacy: A Randomized Field Trial of Procedural Justice (2013, background): “…perceive that the police act in a procedurally just manner— by treating people with dignity and respect, and by being fair and neutral in their actions—then the legitimacy of the police is enhanced (e.g., Mastrofski, Snipes, and Supina, 1996; Reisig and Lloyd, 2009; Sunshine and Tyler, 2003).”
- Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions (2012, background): “But with just one exception 3 , no study outside the US has 1 For non-US work that applies the procedural justice model to public cooperation with legal authorities, see Tankebe (2009), Reisig and Lloyd (2009), Murphy and Cherney (2012) and Jackson et al. (2012).”
- DOES WHAT POLICE DO AT HOT SPOTS MATTER? THE PHILADELPHIA POLICING TACTICS EXPERIMENT* (2015, background): “When community members perceive that police actions are fair, they are more likely to be more satisfied with and have confidence in police services, follow the law, and help police fight crime (Reisig and Lloyd, 2009; Taylor and Lawton, 2014; Tyler, 1988, 2004).”
- Examining Police Effectiveness as a Precursor to Legitimacy and Cooperation with Police (2013, background): “Other studies have not found an age effect (Bennett & Weigand, 1994; Bradford & Jackson, 2010; Davis & Henderson, 2003; Kaariainen & Siren, 2011; Kury et al., 1999; Reisig et al., 2007; Schnebly, 2008).”
- Does procedural justice matter to youth? Comparing adults' and youths' willingness to collaborate with police (2015, methodology): “Hinds (2009) suggested that it did, while Reisig and Lloyd (2008) failed to find an effect.”
- Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy: A Test of Measurement and Structure (2013, methodology): “…Legitimacy Police legitimacy is measured according to Reisig et al. (2007) and Gau (2011), whose use of this measurement strategy was derived from the conceptualization popularized by Tyler and colleagues (e.g., Sunshine & Tyler, 2003; Tyler, 2006; see also Reisig & Lloyd, 2009; Tankebe, 2009).”
- Measuring public perceptions of the police (2010, background): “A recent flurry of research in policing has examined the antecedents and effects of procedural, interactional, and distributive justice (e.g. Paternoster et al., 1997; Reisig et al., 2007; Reisig and Lloyd, 2009; Sunshine and Tyler, 2003; Tyler, 1990; Tyler and Huo, 2002).”
- Procedural justice, police legitimacy, and legal cynicism: a test for mediation effects (2015, unknown): “…Gau, Corsaro, Stewart, & Brunson, 2012; Kochel, Parks, & Mastrofski, 2013; Murphy, 2009; Murphy, Hinds, & Fleming, 2008; Reisig, Bratton, & Gertz, 2007; Reisig & Lloyd, 2009; Sunshine & Tyler, 2003; Tyler, 2006; but see Bradford, Huq, Jackson, & Roberts, 2013; Tankebe, 2009, whose results…”