Renewable energy projects: structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework

396 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

An Extended PROMETHE II Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making Technique Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logic for Sustainable Energy Planning (2016, methodology): “The use of Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques and also the PROMETHEE family had a long history in energy projects and applications (Tzeng et al. 1992; Haralambopoulos and Polatidis 2003; Pohekar and Ramachandran 2004b; Diakoulaki andKarangelis 2007; Tsoutsos et al. 2009; Pušnik and Suc”
An assessment of exploiting renewable energy sources with concerns of policy and technology (2010, background): “Numerous studies also indicate that job creation is one of important criteria to evaluate renewable energy projects (Haralambopoulos and Polatidis, 2003; Beccali et al., 2003; Komor and Bazilian, 2005; Erdoğmus- et al., 2006; Madlener et al., 2007; Doukas et al., 2007; Begic and Afgan, 2007; Chatzim”
Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the VIKOR method. (2011, background): “Investment Ratio, Implementation Period, and Operating and Maintenance Costs are non-beneficial attributes and so lower values are desirable.”
Multi-criteria applications in renewable energy analysis: A literature review (2011, methodology): “The proposed framework was applied to data from different scenarios in a case study of exploitation of geothermal energy sources in the island of Chios, Greece [ 50 ].”