Gender Differences in Pain and Pain Behavior: The Role of Catastrophizing

By Michael J. Sullivan, D. Tripp, D. Santor. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 2000

308 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92c06059946820a0ea893fc374f36df9a967764c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Geert Crombez
2. P. Bijttebier

In Pharmacology

1. Geert Crombez
2. C. Eccleston

In Psychiatry and Mental health

1. Geert Crombez
2. C. Eccleston

Citations in the corpus

• The child version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS‐C): a preliminary validation (2003, background): “Several adult non-clinical studies have found that females have higher scores for catastrophic thinking than males (Sullivan et al., 1995; Osman et al., 1997, 2000; Sullivan et al., 2000).”
• Gender Differences in Pain Perception: The Mediating Role of Self-Efficacy Beliefs (2002, background): “Other indirect evidence for self-efficacy as a potential mediator of gender differences in pain perception is suggested by recent studies (Keefe et al., 2000; Sullivan et al., 2000) that have shown that catastrophizing may explain gender differences in pain.”