Towards Definition, Clinical and Laboratory Criteria, and a Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation

By F. Taylor, C. Toh, K. Hoots, Hideo Wada, M. Levi. Thrombosis and Haemostasis, 2001

2,078 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

High risk of thrombosis in patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection: a multicenter prospective cohort study (2020, methodology): “The JAAM-DIC 2016 score [10] , ISTH overt-DIC score [11] and SIC score [8] were calculated daily until day 7. Scores were considered positive as commonly accepted, if ISTH overt-DIC was 5 points or more, JAAM-DIC score was 4 points or more and if SIC was 4 points or more.”
Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of disseminated intravascular coagulation (2009, positive): “Based on the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare score, which has demonstrated a close correlation between an increasing score and increasing mortality (Wada et al , 1995), the ISTH criteria proposes a 5-step diagnostic algorithm to calculate a DIC score, utilising simple laboratory tests that a”
Hypercoagulability of COVID‐19 patients in intensive care unit: A report of thromboelastography findings and other parameters of hemostasis (2020, background): “The severe inflammatory state secondary to the infection leads to a severe derangement of hemostasis typically observed in patients with sepsis and has been described as a state of acute disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), based on decreased platelet count, prolonged prothrombin and activa”