The Rational Design of International Institutions

By Barbara Koremenos, C. Lipson, D. Snidal. International Organization, 2001

1,955 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Development, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9256e1c91e384c4cb37ea82bcbeeca154a889b98

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Development

In Political Science and International Relations

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Does Flexibility Promote Cooperation? An Application to the Global Trade Regime (2008, methodology): “…three ends: ~1! it defines legal standards that can constrain the abuse of such provisions; ~2! it legitimates the use 13+ See, for example, Sykes 1991; Koremenos, Lipson, and Snidal 2001; and Rosendorff and Milner 2001+ 14+ Koremenos, Lipson, and Snidal 2001, 794–95+ of such provisions insofar…”
The design of international trade agreements: Introducing a new dataset (2013, background): “…to contribute actively to ongoing debates and advancements in research programmes as diverse as legalization (Abbott et al. 2001), rational design (Koremenos et al. 2001; Rosendorff and Milner 2001), diffusion (Simmons and Elkins 2004; Braun and Gilardi 2006), or overlapping regimes (Drezner…”
Mapping the Trade and Environment Nexus: Insights from a New Data Set (2018, background): “First, TREND can contribute to the literature on the rational design of international institutions by revealing which countries include which provisions under which circumstances (Koremenos et al. 2001).”
Treaty Compliance and Violation (2010, background): “This is an example of a broader set of issues that is certainly relevant to treaty violation: how the agreement was written in the first place (Koremenos 2005; Koremenos et al 2001; Rosendorff & Milner 2001; Smith 2000).”
Problem Structure, Institutional Design, and the Relative Effectiveness of International Environmental Agreements (2006, background): “Koremenos, Lipson, and Snidal 2001. structure only in his volume’s conclusion suggests that we can draw conªdent conclusions about regime effectiveness with only high-level and largely inductive distinctions among problem structures.28 Underdal’s framework relies extensively on the aggregate…”
Which Side Are You On? Bias, Credibility, and Mediation (2003, neutral): “In contrast, institutionalists maintain that international institutions can exert influence by providing information, even if they are powerless in a traditional sense (Keohane 1984; Koremenos, Lipson, and Snidal 2001).”
Emergency and Escape: Explaining Derogations from Human Rights Treaties (2011, background): “…of the scope of international implementation procedures and their relationship with the concept of state sovereignty+” McGoldrick 2004, 388+ 3+ See Guzman 2005; Koremenos, Lipson, and Snidal 2001; and Raustiala 2005+ 4+ See Rosendorff and Milner 2001; and Sykes 1991+ 5+ IR studies of escape…”
Globalization, harmonization, and competition: the different pathways to policy convergence (2005, background): “There is a burgeoning literature that discusses how states determine the pattern of transnational regulation (Vogel 1995; Simmons 2001; Mattli 2001; Koremenos et al. 2001).”