Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem

By Neil Gandal, J. Hamrick, Tyler W. Moore, T. Oberman. 2018

646 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9236488f7e5f9a27fa991232020983968f735e79

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Information Systems

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

A systematic review of the bubble dynamics of cryptocurrency prices (2020, neutral): “…[2019]; Beneki et al. [2019]); evidence of price clustering (Urquhart [2017]; Kallinterakis and Wang [2019]), pricing bubbles (Corbet et al. [2018]), regulatory ambiguity (Fry [2018]; Shanaev et al. [2020]), and exceptional levels of both complex and uncomplex fraud (Gandal et al. [2018]).”
Cryptocurrencies: Stylized facts on a new investible instrument (2019, background): “In a similar vein, Gandal et al. (2018) exhibit price manipulation in the Bitcoin market, likely by a single trader.”
Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning, Transaction Reordering, and Consensus Instability in Decentralized Exchanges (2019, background): “At best loosely regulated, centralized exchanges have experienced scandals ranging from high-profile thefts [38] to malfeasance such as price manipulation [22].”
Does global economic uncertainty matter for the volatility and hedging effectiveness of Bitcoin? (2019, background): “, 2015), mounting regulatory scrutiny and market manipulation (Gandal et al., 2018)(4), cyber-attacks, and exchange security flaws.”
Flash Boys 2.0: Frontrunning in Decentralized Exchanges, Miner Extractable Value, and Consensus Instability (2020, background): “At best loosely regulated, centralized exchanges have experienced scandals ranging from high-profile thefts [28] to malfeasance such as price manipulation [18].”
Is Bitcoin Really Untethered? (2020, neutral): “…approximately $450 million worth of bitcoin missing from investors’ accounts.11 Good reasons have been put forward as to why the ’hack’ may have been an inside job.12 Gandal et al. (2018) argues that fraudulent trading on Mt. Gox exchange led to a significant spike in Bitcoin prices in late 2013.”