What's Wrong with the Rorschach? Science Confronts the Controversial Inkblot Test

By J. Wood, M. Nezworski, S. Lilienfeld, H. Garb. 2003

92 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/92042456cd6dc658a4c00cd825cfc87719a74a84

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Jeffrey P. Wittmann
2. Timothy M. Tippins

Citations in the corpus

• EMPIRICAL AND ETHICAL PROBLEMS WITH CUSTODY RECOMMENDATIONS: A Call for Clinical Humility and Judicial Vigilance (2005, background): “The reasoning seems to be that any test, even one of dubious validity, will perform better than merely flipping a coin (Wood et al., 2003, p. 297).”