Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets

By Christopher C. Chang, Carson C. Chow, Laurent Tellier, Shashaank Vattikuti, Shaun Purcell, James J. Lee. GigaScience, 2014

11,330 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BackgroundPLINK 1 is a widely used open-source C/C++ toolset for genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and research in population genetics. However, the steady accumulation of data from imputation and whole-genome sequencing studies has exposed a strong need for faster and scalable implementations of key functions, such as logistic regression, linkage disequilibrium estimation, and genomic distance evaluation. In addition, GWAS and population-genetic data now frequently contain genotype likelihoods, phase information, and/or multiallelic variants, none of which can be represented by PLINK 1’s primary data format.FindingsTo address these issues, we are developing a second-generation codebase for PLINK. The first major release from this codebase, PLINK 1.9, introduces extensive use of bit-level parallelism, On $O\left (\sqrt {n}\right)$ -time/constant-space Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and Fisher’s exact tests, and many other algorithmic improvements. In combination, these changes accelerate most operations by 1-4 orders of magnitude, and allow the program to handle datasets too large to fit in RAM. We have also developed an extension to the data format which adds low-overhead support for genotype likelihoods, phase, multiallelic variants, and reference vs. alternate alleles, which is the basis of our planned second release (PLINK 2.0).ConclusionsThe second-generation versions of PLINK will offer dramatic improvements in performance and compatibility. For the first time, users without access to high-end computing resources can perform several essential analyses of the feature-rich and very large genetic datasets coming into use.

Subfields: Genetics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91e0bb69106b4e8620a1f4ee1d98e0046baafed4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

  1. Matthew Stephens
  2. Peter M. Visscher
  3. Mark J. Daly
  4. Jian Yang
  5. Naomi R. Wray
  6. Zhiwu Zhang
  7. Benjamin M. Neale
  8. Alkes L Price

Citations in the corpus