Port choice behaviour--from the perspective of the shipper

By An-Shuen Nir, Kuang Lin, Gin-Shuh Liang. 2003

190 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Building and Construction, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91db9f058ad0816c3d66ac059784a3dd2924ea2c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Building and Construction

1. A. Pallis
2. F. Parola
3. G. Satta
4. Shao-Wei Lam
5. Loon Ching Tang
6. Joyce Mei Wan Low
7. Theo E. Notteboom *
8. J.P. Rodrigue

In Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering

1. F. Parola
2. A. Pallis
3. G. Satta
4. Theo E. Notteboom *
5. Shao-Wei Lam
6. Loon Ching Tang
7. Joyce Mei Wan Low
8. J.P. Rodrigue

In Transportation

1. F. Parola
2. A. Pallis
3. Shao-Wei Lam
4. Loon Ching Tang
5. Joyce Mei Wan Low
6. Theo E. Notteboom *

Citations in the corpus

• The relationship between port choice and terminal involvement of alliance members in container shipping (2017, methodology): “From previous studies, the main selection criteria of logistics companies and shippers can be identified (see e.g. Nir et al., 2003; Tiwari et al., 2003): a competitive price of port services, reliable services, low time costs for goods, cargo security and damage prevention, facilitation through…”
• Understanding Port Choice Behavior—A Network Perspective (2011, methodology): “More recently, Tiwari et al. (2003), Nir et al. (2003) and Malchow and Kanafani (2004) have employed the Multinomial Logit (MNL) model to estimate the effect of important factors on port choice.”