Deep learning with word embeddings improves biomedical named entity recognition

By Maryam Habibi, Leon Weber, Mariana Neves, David Luis Wiegandt, Ulf Leser. Bioinform., 2017

549 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Motivation: Text mining has become an important tool for biomedical research. The most fundamental text‐mining task is the recognition of biomedical named entities (NER), such as genes, chemicals and diseases. Current NER methods rely on pre‐defined features which try to capture the specific surface properties of entity types, properties of the typical local context, background knowledge, and linguistic information. State‐of‐the‐art tools are entity‐specific, as dictionaries and empirically optimal feature sets differ between entity types, which makes their development costly. Furthermore, features are often optimized for a specific gold standard corpus, which makes extrapolation of quality measures difficult. Results: We show that a completely generic method based on deep learning and statistical word embeddings [called long short‐term memory network‐conditional random field (LSTM‐CRF)] outperforms state‐of‐the‐art entity‐specific NER tools, and often by a large margin. To this end, we compared the performance of LSTM‐CRF on 33 data sets covering five different entity classes with that of best‐of‐class NER tools and an entity‐agnostic CRF implementation. On average, F1‐score of LSTM‐CRF is 5% above that of the baselines, mostly due to a sharp increase in recall. Availability and implementation: The source code for LSTM‐CRF is available at https://github.com/glample/tagger and the links to the corpora are available at https://corposaurus.github.io/corpora/. Contact: habibima@informatik.hu‐berlin.de

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91d4498849fe1966a629cddb187d3cd62eedb2ca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Fangzhao Wu
  2. Chuhan Wu
  3. Yongfeng Huang
  4. Tao Qi
  5. Xing Xie
  6. Steven Bethard
  7. Jaewoo Kang
  8. Jinhyuk Lee

In Molecular Biology

  1. Jingqi Wang
  2. Vikas Yadav
  3. Xing Xie
  4. Jaewoo Kang
  5. Karin M. Verspoor
  6. Kirk Roberts
  7. Erica Schmidt
  8. Steven Bethard

Citations in the corpus