Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: attitudes and ideologies

By Céline Teney, O. P. Lacewell, P. de Wilde. European Political Science Review, 2013

185 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91d27cd1dc546a575407597ba7f40fc8c573e198

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Political Science and International Relations

1. S. Hobolt
2. L. Hooghe
3. G. Marks

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. Hobolt
2. G. Marks
3. L. Hooghe

Citations in the corpus

• Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage (2018, background): “sermann and Kriesi 2015); cosmopolitan vs communitarian (Teney et al. 2014); and GAL vs TAN (Hooghe et al.”
• The Brexit vote: a divided nation, a divided continent (2016, background): “This divide between those who feel left behind by the forces of globalization and mass immigration and those who welcome such developments is also a driving force behind the increasing support for Eurosceptic parties on the radical right and left across Europe (see Kriesi et al. 2012; Teney et al. 2”