Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture – not by affecting ATP synthesis
By G. Cornic. 2000
817 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Molecular Biology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91ba5f9b20aa49e02b880035782a34e1f1373064
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
In Molecular Biology
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. (2002, background): “As Cornic (2000) states, some of the metabolic changes that occur as a result of drought are themselves a consequence of the resistance of the photosynthetic apparatus to dehydration, as seems to be the case for the reversible decrease in F I G .”
- Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.): An open gate to improve water-use efficiency? (2005, background): “However, under more severe water stress situations, non-stomatal inhibition of photosynthesis has been described (Chaves, 1991; Cornic, 2000; Flexas et al., 2004).”
- Understanding down-regulation of photosynthesis under water stress: future prospects and searching for physiological tools for irrigation management (2004, background): “It has been argued that stomatal closure is the main limitation to photosynthesis, since maximum values can be recovered by supplying large amounts of CO2 to the leaves (Cornic, 2000; Cornic & Fresneau, 2002).”
- Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: stomatal and non-stomatal limitations revisited. (2002, background): “, 1999) has further stimulated debate (Cornic, 2000; Lawlor and Cornic, 2002).”
- Paclobutrazol: a novel plant growth regulator and multi-stress ameliorant (2017, background): “Stomatal limitation is generally assumed to be the major reason for decrease in photosynthesis under abiotic stress conditions (Cornic 2000).”
- Effect of 28-homobrassinolide on the drought stress-induced changes in photosynthesis and antioxidant system of Brassica juncea L. (2009, background): “There is a broad consensus that drought induces stomatal closure and consequently the reduction in leaf internal CO2 concentration (Cornic 2000; Flexas et al. 2004).”
- Morphological, physiological and biochemical responses of plants to drought stress (2011, background): “Drought-related reduction in yield and yield components of plants could be ascribed to stomatal closure in response to low soil water content, which decreased the intake of CO2 and, as a result, photosynthesis decreased (Chaves, 1991; Cornic, 2000; Flexas et al., 2004).”
- Water relations and photosynthesis in Cucumis sativus L. leaves under salt stress (2006, background): “reversible increase in the thermal dissipation of energy trapped by PS 2, thus contributing to protection against the deleterious effect of excessive light during reduced CO2 assimilation (Cornic 2000).”
- Photorespiration: metabolic pathways and their role in stress protection. (2000, background): “When the stomatal control of photosynthesis is overcome, for example, by removing the lower epidermis or by increasing the external CO2 concentration, CO2 assimilation can be restored, suggesting that, at least during mild drought, photosynthesis is not inhibited due to damage to the photosynthetic ”
- Regulation of photosynthesis of C3 plants in response to progressive drought: stomatal conductance as a reference parameter. (2002, background): “…closure or through metabolic impairment has been running since the earliest reports on the effects of drought on photosynthesis (Jones, 1973; Boyer, 1976; Quick et al., 1992; Lawlor and Uprety, 1993; Cornic, 1994; Lawlor, 1995; Tezara et al., 1999; Cornic, 2000; Flexas and Medrano, 2002a, b).”
- Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits: prospects for water-saving agriculture. (2004, background): “…the nature and timing of the limitations that water deficits impose on leaf carbon assimilation have again been under debate (Tezara et al., 1999; Cornic, 2000; Lawlor and Cornic, 2002; Flexas et al., 2004b), namely in what concerns stomatal constraints versus non-stomatal limitations , it is…”