Mobile-phone addiction in adolescence : The Test of Mobile Phone Dependence ( TMD )

By Mariano Chóliz. 2012

321 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91b9d3cfbac601754e8a3ba8f8c8c6aa0d082b15

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Too Much Information (2015, unknown): “…studied under different terms such as problematic use (Bianchi & Phillips, 2005; Billieux, Van der Linden, & Rochat, 2008; Lopez-Fernandezet al., 2014), dependence (Choliz, 2012; Toda, Monden, Kubo, & Morimoto, 2004), dysfunctional use (Billieux et al., 2014), and addiction (Kwon et al., 2013).”
Impact of mobile phone addiction on adolescent’s life: A literature review (2016, unknown): “…[36, 3, 51] "problematic mobile phone use" [Billieux, et al. 2008; Takao, et al. 2009] [10, 52], "mobile phone dependence" [Satoko, et al. 2009; Choliz 2012] [43, 14], "compulsive mobile phone use" [Matthews, et al. 2009] and "mobile phone overuse" [Perry and Lee 2007] [37], have all been used…”
Smartphone addiction among university students in the light of some variables (2016, background): “This finding is in line with the studies of Assabawy (2006), Devis-Devis et al. (2009), Walsh et al. (2011), Choliz (2012), and Abo-Arrab and Al-Qosairi (2014).”
Smartphone Addiction among University Undergraduates: A Literature Review (2015, methodology): “Chóliz [12] found that girls generally used their phones more than boys and also were more likely to engage in phone abuse and experience problems with their parents due to excessive use.”
Cell-Phone Addiction: A Review (2016, methodology): “Chóliz (65), supporting his theory using the DSM-IV-TR for substance addiction, mentioned four factors that define addiction and dependence in students: abstinence, lack of control, tolerance, and abuse and interference with other activities (59, 66).”
Modelling smartphone addiction: The role of smartphone usage, self-regulation, general self-efficacy and cyberloafing in university students (2016, background): “Such problematic usage of mobile phones interferes with other activities in daily life, alters interpersonal relations and may even affect people’s health and happiness (Augner & Hacker, 2012; Ch oliz, 2012; Leung, 2008).”
Prevalence of Nomophobia among University Students: A Comparative Study of Pakistani and Turkish Undergraduate Students (2018, background): “However, misuse, uncontrolled overuse might lead to psychological problems called nomophobia and increase the prevalence of this disorder (Chòliz, 2012; Gezgin et al., 2017).”