Effects of light and intraspecific competition on growth and crown morphology of two size classes of understory balsam fir saplings
By Robin Duchesneau, Isabelle Lesage, Christian Messier, H. Morin. 2001
92 citations recorded by the source corpus.
This paper characterizes the growth and crown morphology of young balsam fir saplings naturally regenerated under a gradient of understory light environments and intraspecific competition densities for two size classes (50-100 cm and 100-200 cm). Most growth and crown morphological parameters investigated were strongly related to the natural light gradient investigated (3-83% full sunlight), but the relationship tended to plateau at around 25% full sunlight. The relationships were generally better for the larger size class. Intraspecific competition did not significantly affect growth and crown morphology of saplings receiving less than 25% full sunlight, but it affected relative height growth, relative radial growth and the apical dominance ratio for those receiving more than 25% full sunlight (R2=0.506; p<0.001; R2=0.403; p<0.002; R2=0.348; p<0.001, respectively). These results suggest that live crown ratio, apical dominance ratio and the number of internodal branches can provide, alone or in combination, useful indicators of vigour for understory fir. Such a study provides the basic data inputs required for the development of empirically-derived mechanistic models that can predict understory tree growth and survival.
Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91accb379aefd5d84adf3671644a01f2865681b4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- Plasticity of morphological and physiological traits in response to different levels of irradiance in seedlings of silver fir (Abies alba Mill) (2003, background): “Nevertheless, the known dependency of ADR on sapling size (Duchesneau et al. 2001) cannot alone explain the large difference compared to our results.”