ECOLOGICAL COSTS AND BENEFITS OF DEFENSES IN NECTAR
By L. S. Adler, Rebecca E. Irwin. 2005
188 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91abbf15664d239ba04edca303c17efb9eb5effe
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Plant secondary metabolites in nectar: impacts on pollinators and ecological functions (2017, background): “It is possible that their occurrence in nectar is regulated for ecological functions: to enhance pollination service or protect the flower and/or pollinator rewards (Table 1) (Adler 2001; Adler & Irwin, 2005; Manson et al. 2012; Irwin et al. 2014).”
- How do belowground organisms influence plant–pollinator interactions? (2015, unknown): “Since defenses in flower tissue often deter or even harm pollinators (Adler and Irwin 2005; Crane 1977; Gegear et al. 2007), this may lead to reduced pollinator visitation or decreased pollination success (Adler and Irwin 2012).”
- Nutritional aspects of non-prey foods in the life histories of predaceous Coccinellidae (2009, background): “A wide range of secondary chemicals are found in floral nectar (Baker and Baker, 1978; Adler and Irwin, 2005).”