A double instrumental variable method for geophysical product error estimation

By Jianzhi Dong, Wade T. Crow, Z. Duan, Lingna Wei, Yang Lu. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2019

48 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The global validation of remotely sensed and/or modeled geophysical products is often complicated by a lack of suitable ground observations for comparison. By cross-comparing three independent collocated observations, triple collocation (TC) can solve for geophysical product errors in error-prone systems. However, acquiring three independent products for a geophysical variable of interest can be challenging. Here, a double instrumental variable based algorithm (IVd) is proposed as an extension of the existing single instrumental variable (IVs) approach to estimate product error standard deviation (σ) and product-truth correlation (R) using only two independent products - an easier requirement to meet in practice. An analytical examination of the IVd method suggests that it is less prone to bias and has reduced sampling errors relative to IVs. Results from an example application of the IVd method to precipitation product error estimation show that IVd-based σ and R are good approximations of reference values obtained from TC at the global extent. In addition to their spatial consistency, IVd estimated error metrics also have only marginal (less than 5%) relative biases versus a TC baseline. Consistent with our earlier analytical analysis, these empirical results are shown to be superior to those obtained by IVs. However, several caveats for the IVd approach should be acknowledged. As with TC and IVs, IVd estimates are less robust when the signal-to-noise ratio of geophysical products is very low. Additionally, IVd may be significantly biased when geophysical products have strongly contrasting error auto-correlations.

Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Environmental Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91abba55bf22c62f7a947d0068cd2d178634fd0d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. Dawei Zhang
2. Gang Wang
3. Wei Shao
4. Fan Wang
5. Xiaoyan He
6. Guang-yuan Kan
7. Minglei Ren
8. Haijun Yu

Citations in the corpus

• Re-evaluation of the Power of the Mann-Kendall Test for Detecting Monotonic Trends in Hydrometeorological Time Series (2020, background): “As the MK test statistic is determined by the ranks and sequences of time series rather than the original values, it is robust when dealing with nonnormally distributed data, censored data, and time series with missing values (Hirsch and Slack, 1984), which are commonly encountered in hydrometeorolo”