Design and modeling of auxetic and hybrid honeycomb structures for in-plane property enhancement

By A. Ingrole, A. Hao, R. Liang. 2017

471 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Mechanical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/91a619081fb54acdf70a42df2aae0017d2346981

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Quanjin Ma
2. Eric Li
3. Zhongwei Guan
4. Zhicheng He
5. J. Siregar
6. Aiguo Cheng
7. V. Birman
8. G. Kardomateas

In Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

1. Zhongwei Guan

Citations in the corpus

• Review of Auxetic Materials for Sports Applications: Expanding Options in Comfort and Protection (2018, unknown): “FEM and AM used in conjunction could facilitate such a parametric study with relative ease, for example by varying repeated structures [262].”
• A review of the recent trends on core structures and impact response of sandwich panels (2021, background): “Some cell designs: (a) honeycomb; (b) re-entrant honeycomb; (c) auxetic-strut; (d) auxetic honeycomb (eproduced with permission from Elsevier).(143) 2524 Journal of Composite Materials 55(18)”
• Review of current trends in research and applications of sandwich structures (2018, background): “6) was performed [128] demonstrating the advantage of the latter design.”
• In-plane crashworthiness of re-entrant hierarchical honeycombs with negative Poisson’s ratio (2019, background): “[21] conducted a comparative study of five different auxetic structures, and studied the deformation and failure modes of these structures, and found that the new auxetic-strut structure has better mechanical properties than other structures.”