Search paths of swans foraging on spatially autocorrelated tubers
By B. Nolet, Wolf M. Mooij. 2002
103 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/919cf8729fd76548c5ca34d0d371a304d76d69be
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- S. Shaffer
- Daniel P. Costa
- Peter E. Smouse
- Wayne M. Getz
- Ran Nathan
- David Saltz
- Y. Tremblay
- Michelle A. Kappes
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
- Peter E. Smouse
- Daniel P. Costa
- S. Shaffer
- Wayne M. Getz
- Ran Nathan
- David Saltz
- Michelle A. Kappes
- R. Kadmon
Citations in the corpus
- A comparison of indirect measures of feeding behaviour based on ARGOS tracking data (2007, background): “This hypothesis is supported by studies of area-restricted search (ARS) in which many species exhibit a distinct change in movement behaviour upon arrival at a feeding area (Haskell, 1997; Nolet and Mooij, 2002; Fauchald and Tveraa, 2003).”
- Non‐optimal animal movement in human‐altered landscapes (2007, unknown): “1996; Goodwin & Fahrig 2002; Nolet & Mooij 2002; Fortin 2003; Cant et al .”
- Patch density determines movement patterns and foraging efficiency of large herbivores (2007, background): “Several studies showed that animals often adjust their decision making in relation to the density of food resources (Benhamou and Bovet 1989; Bell 1991; Turchin 1998; Farnsworth and Beecham 1999; Nolet and Mooij 2002; Benhamou 2004; Newlands et al. 2004).”
- Intraspecific variation in movement patterns: modeling individual behaviour in a large marine predator (2004, unknown): “Autocorrelations between successive move lengths were tested using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (Nolet and Mooij 2002).”
- A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research (2008, background): “Flying swans, for example, use visual cues to detect a lake, kilometers away, but use tactile cues to detect tubers in the mud, millimeters away (31).”
- Scales of movement by elk (Cervus elaphus) in response to heterogeneity in forage resources and predation risk (2005, unknown): “…frequency of turns in response to local resource abundance by adopting an area-concentrated search pattern that results in slow, sinuous trajectories within patches and fast, directed trajectories between patches (Ward and Saltz 1994; Haskell 1997; Vernes and Haydon 2001; Nolet and Mooij 2002).”