The Influence of the Ethos of Conflict on Israeli Jews' Interpretation of Jewish—Palestinian Encounters

By D. Bar-Tal, A. Raviv, Alon Raviv, Adi Dgani-Hirsh. 2009

88 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/916f87ea2ad0d3a5c05cf664111f959a9f0e6103

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Social Psychology

1. Eran Halperin
2. Neta Oren
3. D. Bar-Tal
4. James J. Gross
5. Ruthie Pliskin
6. Phillip L. Hammack
7. Smadar Cohen‐Chen
8. Amit Goldenberg

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Eran Halperin
2. D. Bar-Tal
3. Neta Oren
4. James J. Gross
5. Ruthie Pliskin
6. Smadar Cohen‐Chen
7. Phillip L. Hammack
8. Agneta H. Fischer

Citations in the corpus

• Socio–Psychological Barriers to Peace Making: The Case of the Israeli Jewish Society (2010, background): “Recently, Bar-Tal and his colleagues (Bar-Tal et al., 2009) provided the first empirical examination of the way in which the comprehensive configuration of ideological beliefs (also defined as the ethos of conflict) influences the way people process information about conflict-related events.”