Growth rates of six coccolithophorid strains as a function of temperature

By E. Buitenhuis, T. Pangerc, D. J. Franklin, Corinne Le Quéré, G. Malin. 2008

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9160cc462da4fc890cca7c3e6746299a18169ba0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. E. Buitenhuis
2. T. Hashioka
3. C. Daniels
4. R. Sheward
5. Corinne Le Quéré
6. A. Poulton

In Oceanography

1. E. Buitenhuis
2. T. Hashioka
3. C. Daniels
4. R. Sheward
5. Corinne Le Quéré
6. A. Poulton

Citations in the corpus

• Combined constraints on global ocean primary production using observations and models (2013, background): “Triangles, short dashed line: coccolithophores [Buitenhuis et al., 2008].”
• Individual and interacting effects of pCO2 and temperature on Emiliania huxleyi calcification: Study of the calcite production, the coccolith morphology and the coccosphere size (2009, unknown): “Growth rates (μ) were calculated as the slope of a significant linear regression of the natural logarithm of cell concentration against time over the exponential growth phase (Buitenhuis et al., 2008).”
• Biogeochemical implications of comparative growth rates of Emiliania huxleyi and Coccolithus species (2014, background): “…to ours (12-15 °C, 14/10 L/D, 4.20 mol photons m-2 d-1), the 165 growth rate of C. braarudii was 42-51 % that of E. huxleyi, although the strain of E. huxleyi 166 used by Buitenhuis et al. (2008) was a non-calcifying mutant, which have been observed to 167 have higher growth rates (Paasche, 2002).”