Use of the FlowCAM for semi-automated recognition and enumeration of red tide cells (Karenia brevis) in natural plankton samples

By E. Buskey, Cammie J. Hyatt. 2006

130 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Environmental Chemistry, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/915972ac3b7a15ac8f1ea7dc4c0b23cffbb390c1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Environmental Chemistry

1. Filip Meysman
2. E. Zetsche
3. H. Jakobsen

In Oceanography

1. Filip Meysman
2. E. Zetsche
3. H. Sosik
4. R. Olson
5. R. Reynolds
6. H. Jakobsen
7. J. Carstensen
8. D. Stramski

Citations in the corpus

• FlowCAM: Sizing cells and understanding the impact of size distributions on biovolume of planktonic community structure (2011, background): “…oceanographic cruises or mesocosm experiments, and in studying phytoplankton responses on seasonal time scales, including early warning and monitoring of potential harmful algae blooms (e.g. Sieracki et al. 1998, Buskey & Hyatt 2006, Campbell et al. 2008, Nielsen et al. 2010, Pedersen et al. 2010).”
• Measurements and characterization of particle size distributions in coastal waters (2010, result): “[82] Previous studies have demonstrated a good correspondence in abundances of phytoplankton cells determined with a FlowCAM and traditional microscopic counts [See et al., 2005; Buskey and Hyatt, 2006 ].”
• FIRST HARMFUL DINOPHYSIS (DINOPHYCEAE, DINOPHYSIALES) BLOOM IN THE U.S. IS REVEALED BY AUTOMATED IMAGING FLOW CYTOMETRY 1 (2010, background): “The success of early attempts to use commercially available imagingin-flow equipment for HAB detection was limited by inadequate image quality and image recognition software, and by rapid fouling (Buskey and Hyatt 2006, Campbell et al. 2008).”
• Dead or alive? Viability assessment of micro- and mesoplankton (2012, methodology): “Semi-automated technologies for plankton analysis, like FlowCAMw flow imaging (Buskey and Hyatt, 2006), are on the market and are promising for future development, but presently their performance, accuracy and reliability with respect to the quality assurance of ballast water treatment has not been…”