Human Rights and Multinationals: Is there a Problem?

By P. Muchlinski. 2001

169 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: History, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/914c6a4ab507461bc22855221b9ebe279be6ad27

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In History

1. Florian Wettstein
2. C. Macchi
3. E. Giuliani

In Political Science and International Relations

1. Florian Wettstein
2. C. Macchi
3. E. Giuliani

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Florian Wettstein
2. C. Macchi
3. E. Giuliani

Citations in the corpus

• An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: The co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment (2010, unknown): “10Civil society groups have also found inventive ways to introduce new institutions, for example, by using the Alien Tort Claims Act to make MNEs accountable for human rights violations (Muchlinski, 2001).”
• CSR and the Debate on Business and Human Rights: Bridging the Great Divide (2012, background): “Rather, it was the result of the changing context of doing business in the post–Cold War global economy (see, e.g., Cassel 2001; Muchlinski 2001).”
• Multinational corporations’ economic and human rights impacts on developing countries: a review and research agenda (2014, background): “…failed states, repressive regimes or developing countries with weak governance structures has led human rights scholars to advocate for extraterritorial regulation of MNCs activities by their home countries (Muchlinski, 2001; Gagnon et al., 2003; De Schutter, 2006-b; McCorquodale and Simons, 2007).”