Is There a Little Pro? Evidence from Finnish

By Anders Holmberg. Linguistic Inquiry, 2005

428 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian (2007, background): “Recent studies, however, have highlighted 1 See Borer (1989) and, more recently, Alexiadou and Anagnostopoulou (2001) and Holmberg (2005) for partly different characterizations of the parameter and of the status of the null element pro, the details of which would be beyond the scope of this paper.”
Radical Pro Drop and the Morphology of Pronouns (2007, background): “Holmberg (2005) points out that there are two general types of analyses of agreement-related pro drop that adhere to minimalist assumptions.”
The case of PRO (2008, background): “58 Languages like Finnish, see Holmberg (2005), Russian and Czech display somewhat similar variability of left edge lexicalization.”
Crosslinguistic influence and language dominance in older bilingual children (2007, background): “8 The null-subject parameter is currently being redefined in theoretical syntax work (see Holmberg, 2005).”
Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian (2006, background): “A typical example from spontaneous production is shown in (1): 1) Paolai non ha telefonato perché leii è uscita presto.”