Portfolio Resampling: Review and Critique
By B. Scherer. 2002
141 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Management Science and Operations Research, Ocean Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/912959ae111d96146988ef5d54445f87c997645e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Ocean Engineering
Citations in the corpus
- Portfolio selection with higher moments (2010, unknown): “…probability model.z In an attempt to maintain the decision simplicity associated with the efficient frontier and still accommodate parameter uncertainty, Michaud (1998) proposes a sampling based method for estimating a ‘resampled efficient frontier’ (see Scherer 2002, 2006 for further discussion).”
- Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? (2009, unknown): “5 Michaud (1998) has advocated the use of resampling methods; Scherer (2002) and Harvey et al. (2003) discuss the various limitations of this approach. optimization.”
- Multivariate Shrinkage for Optimal Portfolio Weights (2007, background): “Michaud (1998) and Scherer (2002) propose estimating the moments from the historical data, simulating paths of returns using these moments, calculating weights for each path and averaging over these weights.”
- Portfolio Selection with Parameter and Model Uncertainty: A Multi-Prior Approach (2004, unknown): “Scherer (2002) describes the resampling approach in detail and discusses some of its limitations, while Harvey, Liechty, Liechty, and M˜uller (2003) discuss other limitations and provide an estimate of the loss incurred by an investor who chooses a portfolio based on this approach.”