An L2-identity and pinned distance problem
By Bochen Liu. Geometric and Functional Analysis, 2018
47 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Let μ\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mu}$$\end{document} be a Frostman measure on E⊂Rd\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${E\subset\mathbb{R}^d}$$\end{document}. The spherical average estimate ∫Sd-1|μ^(rω)|2dω≲r-β\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\int_{S^{d-1}}|\widehat{\mu}(r\omega)|^2\,d\omega\lesssim r^{-\beta}$$\end{document}was originally used to attack Falconer distance conjecture, via Mattila’s integral. In this paper we consider the pinned distance problem, a stronger version of Falconer distance problem, and show that spherical average estimates imply the same dimensional threshold on both of them. In particular, with the best known spherical average estimates, we improve Peres–Schlag’s result on pinned distance problem significantly. The idea in our approach is to reduce the pinned distance problem to an integral where spherical averages apply. The key new ingredient is the following identity. Using a group action argument, we show that for any Schwartz function f on Rd\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\mathbb{R}^d}$$\end{document} and any x∈Rd\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${x\in\mathbb{R}^d}$$\end{document}, ∫0∞|ωt∗f(x)|2td-1dt=∫0∞|ωr^∗f(x)|2rd-1dr,\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\int_0^\infty|\omega_t*f(x)|^2\,t^{d-1}dt\,=\int_0^\infty|\widehat{\omega_r}*f(x)|^2\,r^{d-1}dr,$$\end{document}where ωr\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${\omega_r}$$\end{document} is the normalized surface measure on rSd-1\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$${r S^{d-1}}$$\end{document}. An interesting remark is that the right hand side can be easily seen equal to cd∫Dx-d-12e-2πit-Δf(x)2dt=cd′∫Dx-d-22e2πitΔf(x)2dt.\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$c_d\int\left|D_x^{-\frac{d-1}{2}}e^{-2\pi it\sqrt{-\Delta}}f(x)\right|^2\,dt=c_d'\int\left|D_x^{-\frac{d-2}{2}}e^{2\pi{it}\Delta}f(x)\right|^2\,dt.$$\end{document}An alternative derivation of Mattila’s integral via group actions is also given in the Appendix.
Subfields: Applied Mathematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9128b32a4dc5e0848d4ad13c4730b3053c3af51e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Mathematics
Citations in the corpus
- On Falconer’s distance set problem in the plane (2018, methodology): “In [26], Liu proved the following remarkable identity: for any function f ,”
- New Bounds on the Dimensions of Planar Distance Sets (2018, background): “or the full distance set improves upon (1.1) for s2(1;6=5). See Figure1for a comparison of the lower bounds from Theorems1.1,1.3and1.4and Wolff’s lower bound. After this paper was made public, B. Liu [14] posted a preprint extending Wolff’s result to pinned distance sets. In particular, he shows tha”