The global burden of multiple chronic conditions: A narrative review

By C. Hajat, Emma Stein. Preventive medicine reports, 2018

782 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Globally, approximately one in three of all adults suffer from multiple chronic conditions (MCCs). This review provides a comprehensive overview of the resulting epidemiological, economic and patient burden. There is no agreed taxonomy for MCCs, with several terms used interchangeably and no agreed definition, resulting in up to three-fold variation in prevalence rates: from 16% to 58% in UK studies, 26% in US studies and 9.4% in Urban South Asians. Certain conditions cluster together more frequently than expected, with associations of up to three-fold, e.g. depression associated with stroke and with Alzheimer's disease, and communicable conditions such as TB and HIV/AIDS associated with diabetes and CVD, respectively. Clusters are important as they may be highly amenable to large improvements in health and cost outcomes through relatively simple shifts in healthcare delivery. Healthcare expenditures greatly increase, sometimes exponentially, with each additional chronic condition with greater specialist physician access, emergency department presentations and hospital admissions. The patient burden includes a deterioration of quality of life, out of pocket expenses, medication adherence, inability to work, symptom control and a high toll on carers. This high burden from MCCs is further projected to increase. Recommendations for interventions include reaching consensus on the taxonomy of MCC, greater emphasis on MCCs research, primary prevention to achieve compression of morbidity, a shift of health systems and policies towards a multiple-condition framework, changes in healthcare payment mechanisms to facilitate this change and shifts in health and epidemiological databases to include MCCs.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Education, Epidemiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/9113068bbb5cecb32a435a3a01aeaba980121cc7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

  1. P. Gasque
  2. D. Collado-Mateo
  3. M. Fernández-Del-Olmo
  4. A. Luque-Casado
  5. Marta Leyton-Román
  6. Diana Amado-Alonso
  7. Ana Myriam Lavín-Pérez
  8. J. Del Coso

Citations in the corpus