End-to-end multitask learning, from protein language to protein features without alignments

By Ahmed Elnaggar, Michael Heinzinger, Christian Dallago, Burkhard Rost. 2019

19 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Correctly predicting features of protein structure and function from amino acid sequence alone remains a supreme challenge for computational biology. For almost three decades, state-of-the-art approaches combined machine learning and evolutionary information from multiple sequence alignments. Exponentially growing sequence databases make it infeasible to gather evolutionary information for entire microbiomes or meta-proteomics. On top, for many important proteins (e.g. dark proteome and intrinsically disordered proteins) evolutionary information remains limited. Here, we introduced a novel approach combining recent advances of Language Models (LMs) with multi-task learning to successfully predict aspects of protein structure (secondary structure) and function (cellular component or subcellular localization) without using any evolutionary information from alignments. Our approach fused self-supervised pre-training LMs on an unlabeled big dataset (UniRef50, corresponding to 9.6 billion words) with supervised training on labelled high-quality data in one single end-to-end network. We provided a proof-of-principle for the novel concept through the semi-successful per-residue prediction of protein secondary structure and through per-protein predictions of localization (Q10=69%) and the distinction between integral membrane and water-soluble proteins (Q2=89%). Although these results did not reach the levels obtained by the best available methods using evolutionary information from alignments, these less accurate multi-task predictions have the advantage of speed: they are 300-3000 times faster (where HHblits needs 30-300 seconds on average, our method needed 0.045 seconds). These new results push the boundaries of predictability towards grayer and darker areas of the protein space, allowing to make reliable predictions for proteins which were not accessible by previous methods. On top, our method remains scalable as it removes the necessity to search sequence databases for evolutionary related proteins.

Subfields: Molecular Biology, Natural Language Processing, Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Molecular Biology

  1. Alexander Rives
  2. Amy X. Lu
  3. Alan M. Moses
  4. Adrian Weller
  5. C. Lawrence Zitnick
  6. Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski
  7. Tamás Sarlós
  8. Rob Fergus

In Natural Language Processing

  1. Myle Ott
  2. Jason Aaron Edward Weston
  3. Jerry Ma
  4. Mohit Bansal
  5. Lukasz Kaiser
  6. Marzyeh Ghassemi
  7. Demi Guo
  8. Kyunghyun Cho

In Representation & Self-Supervised Learning

  1. Krzysztof Marcin Choromanski
  2. Tamás Sarlós
  3. Adrian Weller
  4. Valerii Likhosherstov
  5. David Dohan
  6. David Belanger
  7. Lucy J. Colwell
  8. Jared Davis

Citations in the corpus