Sum of ranking differences compares methods or models fairly
By Károly Héberger. 2010
294 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Analytical Chemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Spectroscopy
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90de273e3a2c1044eb3bb20ad4a5627db3ce5696
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Analytical Chemistry
- Aoife A. Gowen
- Colm O'Donnell
- Anita Rácz
- Dávid Bajusz
- K. Kollár‐Hunek
- G. Downey
- Carlos Esquerre
- Károly Héberger
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Anita Rácz
- Dávid Bajusz
- K. Kollár‐Hunek
- Colm O'Donnell
- Carlos Esquerre
- Aoife A. Gowen
- G. Downey
- Károly Héberger
In Spectroscopy
- K. Kollár‐Hunek
- Anita Rácz
- Dávid Bajusz
- G. Downey
- Colm O'Donnell
- Carlos Esquerre
- Aoife A. Gowen
- Károly Héberger
Citations in the corpus
- Why is Tanimoto index an appropriate choice for fingerprint-based similarity calculations? (2015, methodology): “Sum of ranking differences is a novel and simple procedure [26,27,33] to compare methods, models, analytical techniques, etc.”
- Preventing over‐fitting in PLS calibration models of near‐infrared (NIR) spectroscopy data using regression coefficients (2011, methodology): “Chemometrics 2011; 25: 375–381 Copyright 2010 John Wil The sum of ranking differences [11] was calculated for each method used to estimate a.”
- Sum of ranking differences for method discrimination and its validation: comparison of ranks with random numbers (2011, methodology): “It can be applied to compare predictive models [1] and validation procedures [19], to select chromatographic columns [1], to test panel consistency in”