PREDICTING PRESENCE AND ABUNDANCE OF A SMALL MAMMAL SPECIES: THE EFFECT OF SCALE AND RESOLUTION

By John L. Orrock, J. F. Pagels, William J. McShea, E. Harper. 2000

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/90da55e5876b32c4ea4408b68469d9e07485ba82

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

HABITAT ASSOCIATIONS OF SMALL MAMMALS AT TWO SPATIAL SCALES IN THE NORTHERN SIERRA NEVADA (2006, background): “Orrock et al. (2000) suggested that for southern red-backed voles (Myodes gapperi), coarse-grained information of habitat type (e.g., forest type) may allow for identification of suitable areas for more refined (e.g., mesohabitat) assessments that require minimal effort.”
Rabbit populations and game management: the situation after 15 years of rabbit haemorrhagic disease in central-southern Spain (2008, background): “Furthermore, another important issue to consider in studies of the influence of vegetation cover is the role of scale (Orrock et al. 2000).”
SMALL MAMMAL USE OF MICROHABITAT REVIEWED (2004, background): “Are these conclusions at odds with contrary research in both temperate and desert * Correspondent: jorgensen.eric@epa.gov 2004 American Society of Mammalogists www.mammalogy.org 531 systems in North America (Morris 1987; Jorgensen and Demarais 1999; Orrock et al. 2000)?”
Small mammal responses to coarse woody debris distribution at different spatial scales in managed and unmanaged boreal forests (2012, result): “Our results substantiate the existence of spatial structures at different scales for small mammals (Orrock et al., 2000; Bowman et al., 2001; Manning and Edge, 2004).”
The influence of research scale on bald eagle habitat selection along the lower Hudson River, New York (USA) (2002, background): “…wildlife habitat research, conducted either at a single spatial scale or at discrete ’micro-’ and ’macro-’ scales, risks missing important patterns that are readily apparent at other scales (Wiens 1989; Baker et al. 1995), or drawing incorrect conclusions regarding habitat use (Orrock et al. 2000).”
Body size, niche breadth, and ecologically scaled responses to habitat fragmentation: mammalian predators in an agricultural landscape (2003, background): “Without an understanding of the scale-dependent responses of long-tailed weasels to habitat fragmentation, management actions implemented to ameliorate the negative effects of fragmentation, such as habitat-based prescriptions for reducing nest predation, might be less effective or fail (Gehring, 20”
Assessing the suitability of central European landscapes for the reintroduction of Eurasian lynx (2002, methodology): “…(Buckland & Elston 1993; FitzGibbon 1993; Wilson et al. 1997; Mace et al. 1999; Mladenoff, Sickley & Wydeven 1999; Palma, Beja & Rodrigues 1999; Rodriguez & Andrén 1999; Bradbury et al. 2000; Gates & Donald 2000; Manel, Buckton & Ormerod 2000; Orrock et al. 2000; Suarez, Balbontin & Ferrer 2000).”